Tag Archives: Innovation Management

The first rule of crowdsourcing: know what you want, understand what you need

I like to argue (for example, here) that the most important factor that defines the ultimate success or failure of any crowdsourcing campaign is the ability to properly identify and articulate the problem–technological, business or social–that the crowd will be … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Know your neighbor (The virtues of crowdsourcing)

Before I turn to the virtues of crowdsourcing, let me tell you a story that happened 7-8 years ago. I worked with a client, a statistician in the consumer product field. (To tell this story freely, I changed the industry … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is crowdsourcing pitting “experts” against “amateurs”?

In my previous post, I argued that one of the reasons crowdsourcing hasn’t yet become a mainstream innovation tool is the uncertainty over what crowdsourcing can (or can’t) do, meaning that many organizations struggle with identifying problems that can be successfully solved by … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Can crowdsourcing fix your marriage problems?

  I think that one of the reasons crowdsourcing hasn’t yet become a mainstream innovation tool is the uncertainty over what crowdsourcing can (or can’t) do. I’m often asked the same question: can crowdsourcing solve this problem; what about that … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What do you need to innovate? Freedom! Yes, freedom.

We love talking about nurturing a culture of innovation; yet, our list of practical measures to promote entrepreneurial spirit is depressingly short. For this reason, I’ve set out to create a list of specific corporate policies that organizations may try in … Continue reading

Posted in Global Innovation, Innovation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Crowdsourcing: two approaches, two different outcomes

In my July 16 post, I set out to prove that crowdsourcing is a very cost-effective tool allowing solving problems at much less cost compared to other innovation tools, and, therefore, the low popularity of crowdsourcing, of which I wrote … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Now, what about money?

In my previous post, I wondered why as efficient innovation tool as it is, crowdsourcing is still seldom used by organizations. I offered two answers to this question. First, formulating a question to crowdsource requires careful deconstruction of the underlying … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

A Performance Paradox: Why Is Crowdsourcing So Seldom Used?

Call it a performance paradox: while being an effective innovation tool, crowdsourcing is seldom used by organizations. A fresh example of this paradox came in the recent Gartner 2016 CIO Agenda Report (highlighted in a June 27, 2016 Forbes article). … Continue reading

Posted in Crowdsourcing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Dis-r-r-r-uption!

My previous post has triggered a number of interesting, often negative, comments in various LinkedIn Groups. My opponents criticized my suggestion that the current state of innovation wasn’t as bad (“broken”) as a few recent articles I referred to were … Continue reading

Posted in Innovation | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

Is Innovation Broken?

I’m amused with the recent stream of publications describing the supposedly dreadful state of innovation. We’re informed that “innovation today disappoints,” that it’s “not delivering” and that “our innovation systems are breaking down.” We’re also told that “people are fed … Continue reading

Posted in Innovation | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments